The Magic of Replication

November 2nd, 2009

IMG_1231bWe all know the golden rule of business: “it’s {10x cheaper|3 times easier|90% more profitable} to sell another unit to a current customer than to acquire a new one.” What we’re really talking about here is “replication” and it has much wider applications than customer acquisition.

A “Black Hat” Example
3-5 years ago, the name of the game in SEO was the “blog and ping” method. Essentially, this involved writing a blog post, and then “pinging”, or sending that URL to aggregation websites (Technorati is probably the most notable surviving member) where the links would be posted.

These aggregation sites were great for search engines, as it gave them an inside track to breaking news. They began to crawl the “New Posts” pages frequently, leading to rapid indexation for bloggers who participated in pinging. Eventually, the size of your ping list was just as important as the content of your post.

Of course, like anything with the potential to generate money, methods were invented to automate and scale. One method was to hide a 1-pixel iFrame on your site which loaded the submission page for a ping website. You could load 100s of these pixels on each page of your website. Because the page was loaded by your visitor’s browser, these 100s of pings seemed to come from all over the country, from different IP addresses.

What does this have to do with replication?

Let’s say Google crawled the Technorati page showing the most-pinged posts and saw John’s Blog post on “How I Repaired my Credit” at the top of the list. The spider makes a note to crawl John’s site and moves on. The blog post gets indexed, and John gets 5 hits on his site, each of those 5 people load his iFrames, which ping Technorati 5 more times.

Google comes back to the Technorati page an hour later and sees John’s post is still at the top of the list. The spider tells Google to put a rush on indexing John’s post. The post gets indexed and John gets 25 visitors on his site. Once again, the iFrame is fired 25 times from different IP addresses.

This could go on for days. Each time John gets a visitor, Technorati thinks that John’s site is growing in popularity, and Google sees John’s blog climbing the ranks. Google begins to think that John’s post is the authority on “how to repair credit” and sends him visitors. Those visitors inadvertently ping Technorati (and others) and Google keeps finding links to John’s site.

This is a great example of replication: 1 visitor leads to 2 visitors, leads to 5… on and on until you max out the machine.

A “White Hat” Example
If you haven’t signed up for LinkedIn you have probably at least gotten “invitations” to connect from friends and colleagues. That’s because, in the middle of the registration process, LinkedIn requests permission to look through your contact list to see who else is on LinkedIn. They also give you the option to spam invite people you know who aren’t yet on LinkedIn to join.

Of course, not everyone lets LinkedIn use their contact list, but there is incentive. A larger network on LinkedIn gives you certain benefits. So we know that some percentage of new users will expose their contacts to this system.

Let’s say that 1 in 10 take advantage of this feature, and that the average person has 100 contacts to send to, and that LinkedIn has a 10% signup rate, on average.

All LinkedIn has to do is get 10 signups before one person hands over their contacts, which leads to a further 10 signups (10% * 100), which leads to another 100 contacts mailed, and 10 more signups, and 100 more emails…

Optimizing the Replication
In the LinkedIn example, what would it be worth to increase their rate of “contact-allowance” to 20%? Or to increase their invitation response rate to 11%?

They would be increasing their net gain for each iteration. Improving either of those ratios leads to exponential gains down the line. If they increased both ratios simultaneously the gains are multiplied. By the third “generation” they’ve more than doubled their user population over the total if they had done nothing.

Increase Response Rate to 11%:

Userbase Iteration 1 Iteration 2 Iteration 3
10 20 40 80
10 21 44 92

Increase Permission to Invite Colleagues to 20%:

Userbase Iteration 1 Iteration 2 Iteration 3
10 20 40 80
10 30 90 270

Both Increases, Compounded:

Userbase Iteration 1 Iteration 2 Iteration 3
10 20 40 80
10 32 102 326

By improving their process, LinkedIn would quadruple their user base after just 3 iterations!

The Take Home
How can you use you website, your emails, your customer service processes, your products or your business itself to replicate something valuable? Once you have a replication action, measure the ratio. Then work on improving that ratio.

Tags for This Post: google, customer acquisition, technorati, name of the game, money methods

Make New Friends via AdWords

October 9th, 2009

handshakeAdSense is the revenue source for the unimaginative.

People see the Google brand and think that they will get more (or more-guaranteed) revenue from Google Ads than from other sources. Knowing that people would rather make more, but don’t have the guts or the skill to test it, you have the advantage in negotiating partnerships with websites using AdSense. Here’s a trick I have used to successfully negotiate premium listings on popular niche websites.

Visit this script: http://www.untouchablemarketing.com/tools/adcrawl.php

You can change the ‘?kw=’ variable in the URL bar to whatever you’re looking for.

One quick note: I downloaded this script from ::emp:: of BlindApeSEO. He deserves credit for putting this out for the community.

What happens next is that the crawler looks through the first 50 or so Google results for that keyword and locates pages that have Google AdSense code on them. Do this a few times with a few of your keywords to get a list of 20-25 URLs.

Next, you take your URL list into AdWords and start a new site-targeted campaign. Use these URLs as the sites you want to target.

Note: when you first start the campaign Google will only let you pick a root domain, not a specific page. Go ahead and use the root domain from one of your URLs to start with. When your new campaign is up and running, use the ‘Quick Add’ link in the AdGroup view to add the specific URLs from your list (remember to delete the root URL you added, adding HowItWorks.com or WikiHow.com can blow a lot of money!).

Let the campaign run for a few days or weeks to generate some data. Once a URL has 100 clicks on it, evaluate its performance: are there conversions? If so, go to the next step. If not, evaluate whether the cost of the ad may be worth it from a PR or branding standpoint, then adjust your ad accordingly.

If you have received some leads from a placement then it’s time to forge a partnership. This can be done one of two ways, and which way you go depends on if you have an established affiliate program or not.

If you are already running an affiliate program (meaning you are the AM), then figure out how much money the website owner would have received for the conversions they sent you if they had been enrolled in your program, and send the owner an email. I suggest starting with a subject line like ‘Thanks for the Traffic!’ or ‘Thanks for the Clients!’ which will usually get people interested in reading your mail.

If you don’t have an affiliate program, figure out a dollar value you’d be willing to pay for each lead and present it to the site owner as a business proposition.

In the body of the email, respectfully convey to the site owner that you recently used Google to put an ad on their site, and via your tracking you have determined that you paid $x per lead for y number of leads (you can sandbag this number a bit, they won’t know what the actual dollar value is).

Since Google takes a cut, you know that they made less than that from AdSense, but the good news is you want to offer them $z (where z < x), and if they had been enrolled they could have earned (y * $z) instead of whatever AdSense gave them. Let them know that you will happily continue running the ad on their site, but you’d prefer to deal with them directly.

Upon reading your email, your prospective partner is going to check their AdSense earnings, realize that they didn’t make anything near what you’re offering, and immediately write back to partner up.

Once your partnership has been established, you can now make all kinds of suggestions to the site owner about how they can better advertise your program. This works especially well with niche directory sites. I once got a prominent banner, button and link on the homepage of a topically-related site, and an interior full-page with copy about my service and website, and I only paid when the traffic was worth it.

Tags for This Post: google, root url, crawler, google results, emp

Friction in Design

October 7th, 2009

I have to say, that I’ve been impressed with Comcast’s re-branding efforts over the last 12 months or so. People (not me) seem to like the singing commercials with the bird’s-eye, 90′s video game artwork. And their website has become much more colorful, friendly and well thought out.

HOWEVER, there is one thing about this site that really irks me. Comcast aren’t the only ones who are guilty, but this is one of the more extreme cases I’ve seen lately. Take a look at the picture below and tell me what’s wrong. Can you spot it?

Sign In To Comcast.com

The field is asking me for my user name. Underneath the field, in 10-pixel, gray font, there is a very definitive statement: “Your user name is your e-mail address”

If my user name is my email address, then why don’t you just ask me for my email address in the big, bold font?

First of all, ‘User Name’ indicates a sign-on which is specific to this site. That puts the user in the mode of trying to remember their standard user name, or what user name they might have chosen for this site. Email addresses are global, everyone knows theirs and it only has one meaning (this is contextual, of course. But I would know from my purposes of using the site if I needed to use my business or personal email).

Second, I understand the difficulties in switching from a user name based system to an email-based one (I’ve been through it), but there is a definitive statement that my user name is my email address, so that’s not what’s happening here.

Why frustrate your users? Why increase the usage of your “Send my user name” form?

Where are the friction points on your website? Where can you improve your language to be clear and concise?

Tags for This Post: e mail address, game artwork, gray font, definitive statement, friction points

How Age Verification Strangles Your Website

September 24th, 2009

579005_breakthroughI find myself explaining this quite a bit since working with Coors and Co. and Miller Brewing Shop on their age-verification methodology, so I thought I’d do a blog post to answer some of the common questions surrounding this topic, which is becoming a major roadblock for alcohol, tobacco, and other age-restricted producers on the web.

Not surprisingly, the porn industry figured this out about 10 years ago.

What is Required of Age Verification and Why?

The beer brewing industry, like any smart industry of a certain age, has decided to voluntarily police itself, rather than risk government intervention in keeping minors away from their marketing materials, which can be costly, painful, and ultimately hurts business.

To that end, the Beer Institute has published some guidelines for brewers to follow, one of which is to ask people for their age before they can enter the site. Most brewers will also check information against a public records database before sending you a catalog anyway, so this is more a proactive measure.

So, the reason you need to fill in your age on every beer site is because breweries would rather police themselves than be policed by M.A.D.D. and the government.

Can We Help You?

If you’re looking for help in solving a problem involving age verification and search engines, chances are we can help. Feel free to contact us for a no-cost, no-obligation consultation about your specific challenge.

How Does Age Verification Interfere with Search Marketing?

Most breweries want to provide a branded page where they can verify a user’s age, and then deliver underage visitors to a page talking about their commitment to keeping alcohol away from minors (once again, to show that they are policing themselves).

For the typical developer looking at this requirement, this is a simple redirection to a form page and then a decision based on subtraction to another page. The craftier dev. will also include logic to forward the verified user back to the page they were originally trying to visit.

However, this poses a problem for search engine robots, who cannot verify their age (most of them are younger than 21, anyway). All they ever see is the age verification page, never the products. This results in them never showing the brewer’s site for no-brainer product searches like “coors mug” or “zima hat.”

You may think this isn’t such a big deal, but let’s take a look at a current example.

Last month, 110 people searched for “bushmills shirt.” That’s 110 people looking for a specific product. A Bushmill’s owned site is nowhere to be found in the search results, but there is a perfectly good selection of Bushmills’ shirts right here. You’ll have to verify your age to see that link, and remember they’re in the UK, so it’s day first, then month (that’s another post for another day).

Checking Google’s cache of that page reveals the problem. Bushmills is redirecting un-verified visitors to their age verification page.

Bushmills is missing out on anywhere from 1-110 t-shirt sales each month. And there are other searches as well, “bushmills hat” “bushmills glass” etc.

I have a list of over 100 alcohol brands. Of those, only a handful do age verification properly (literally 4 or 5). Some of them have blogs, images, and recipes locked up behind age-verification redirects. How much would it help a vodka brand to come up for a search of “Red Bull and Vodka Recipe” (bad example, who doesn’t know how that works?).

Incidentally, if anyone from DiaGeo is reading this, I would like to talk to you about helping with the Age-Verification on some of your apparel stores.

Tags for This Post: alcohol tobacco, miller brewing, public records database, age verification, search engine robots, proactive measure, verification methodology, porn industry

Polluting the Crime Scene

January 9th, 2009

If you watch enough TV (in this case, ‘enough’ is probably an hour a week) you’ve seen a crime drama. And if you’ve seen a crime drama, you know that at least 30 seconds of each show is always dedicated to somebody scolding someone else for contaminating the crime scene with boot-prints, finger-prints, their own blood, whatever…

Catching up on my weekly reading I stumbled across the story of Liskula Cohen, a model who is suing Google to release the identity of a Blogspot blogger who has allegedly defamed her character. The TechCrunch article states “It’s nearly impossible to identify bloggers who don’t reveal their real name without the help of the companies that maintain publishing platforms.” but as we all know from recent history (Walmart’s Jim and Laura, JoyniceKanellis), there is almost always a way to find out someone’s identity, and SEO’s make great detectives…

Turning this into a public media circus is certainly not the least-damaging way to manage it, for two reasons: one, the linking profile of the Skanks in NYC Blog is now totally lopsided with parroted news reports from all over the web (and articles like this one) and two, news stories about you suing some “defenseless blogger” from sites like TechCrunch, CNet, Wired, etc. are 10x more likely to show up for a search of your name than some PR N/A Blogspot blog ever was.

Okay, so maybe obfuscating the linking profile of the blog isn’t the worst thing in the world, but the truth is that if you run a blog for any significant period of time, eventually you’re going to drop a link to it from somewhere where you don’t have anonymity. Even a forum-handle can be the key that unlocks a whole wealth of information about your past (see the JoyniceKanellis example above). A skilled Online Reputation Management firm could have deduced the attacker’s identity from linking profiles, keywords, nicknames, etc. and a lawsuit could have been filed under the radar.

It’s possible I don’t know how the world of modeling works, and maybe coming off as attention-seeking or as being the kind of person to hang a picture with a sledgehammer is desirable in the modeling community. It seems to me that it would make more sense to play the lawyer card on a real author or journalist who defames you in a real publication, not some two-bit blogger who can’t even afford a domain name.

As hurtful as it may be to see this kind of thing printed about you, let’s think about what the real exposure was, and what it will be now:

* I seriously doubt (but can’t confirm) that searching for her name + the word “skank” produced any more than 1 relevant result before this frenzy, probably from the blog in question, if even that. And to be honest, if someone is searching for “[your name] skank,” they’ve already formed an opinion of you.

* Big news sites picked up the lawsuit story, and 2 of them already rank for a search of Liskula Cohen. Now 20% of the results feature her name and the word “skank” in the same headline.

* You have no recourse against news sites because they are simply reporting on the court proceedings, someone searching for your name will now almost certainly see your name associated with the word “skank” in the future.

I understand that seeing pictures of yourself with such hateful words printed could be enraging, but in my opinion, public celebrities need to expect some amount of that kind of thing. So what would be my first line of defense? Cut ‘em off at the knees.

Someone who starts a blog to say these things wants traffic, otherwise they’d just email it. There are many ways to have a site demoted or removed from search engines, especially on a weak subdomain with few incoming links of its own, and in a neighborhood as bad as Blogspot (Blogspot? A bad neighborhood?! Bull!).

As it stands now, all this attention is probably making ‘Skanks in NYC’ one of the most powerful blogsot sudomains in history (up there with Stuff White People Like), which makes it a thousand times harder to “de-optimize”.

By applying a few blackhat SEO tactics quietly, this blog could have been made to never rank for anything for the rest of its existence, and would either discourage its creator, or enrage him/her to the point where they come out of hiding (probably to DigitalPoint asking why they don’t rank for “liskula cohen skank”). No media craziness, no permanent “skank” stamp on your personal Google results.

But what do I know about being a model? Or a CSI for that matter…

Tags for This Post: boot prints, media circus, google, great detectives, finger prints, walmart, online reputation management

Click-Through on Organic Results

October 22nd, 2008

I spent some time this morning responding to an email on this topic, so I thought I’d post it here too as a reference.

There are three studies that I know of that have attempted to answer or predict the CTR of organic results. Each has a different methodology and sample data, but the results are similar.

First up, this one is based on the AOL data that was leaked a couple years ago. Someone plugged all the click data into a formula and got these results. Note, that this is AOL data, and it’s widely believed that those searchers behave differently than more savvy Google or Yahoo users: AOL Clickthrough Study Data

Second, this study was done by Cornell University using eye and click tracking equipment. It’s probably the most experimentally sound, but of course the people also knew they were in an experiment and were given specific search terms like “shopping” that might not be relevant to their state of mind. Cornell Organic Click-through Study

Finally, there is a third study done by me in my former life as a corporate SEO, which pre-dates the first two studies I mentioned. This one used keyword volume estimates and # of visits from a given keyword in a given ranking to a specific website. Because the dataset was smaller, I extrapolated the results to a logarithmic function which I have since forgotten. But the spreadsheet still contains the ranks.

The beauty of these results is twofold: 1. I think it better represents the B2B searcher and, 2. because it’s a function you can extrapolate the CTR on any given ranking (although since I don’t remember the formula, this sheet only goes back to result #200, but if you’re ranking past 20 you shouldn’t care about CTR anyway). Here’s a sample of my results, and you can download the full spreadsheet here:

Rank CTR
1 42.30%
2 11.92%
3 8.44%
4 6.03%
5 4.86%
6 3.99%
7 3.37%
8 2.98%
9 2.83%
10 2.97%

Tags for This Post: volume estimates, google, logarithmic function, cornell university, yahoo users

The Blind Side of the Web

September 21st, 2008

I just finished reading Michael Lewis’ book The Blind Side. It is a deep look at the game of football from a strategic, tactical, political and sociological perspective, told within the biography of a high-school player from Memphis named Michael Oher. The title of the book, and much of its exposition, is derived from a shift in football strategy that took place in the 80′s and 90′s.

To summarize this shift: quarterbacks did not often throw the ball until Joe Montana came along (with help from his coach, Bill Walsh). When a right-handed quarterback drops back to throw the ball he typically turns so that his right-shoulder is back, causing his field of vision to be biased to the right. This creates a “blind side” on his left, from where he can’t see defensive players coming to tackle him. This blind side was originally exploited by the NY Giants, and specifically by Lawrence Taylor, who made use of this blind spot to train-wreck quarterbacks in the middle of their throw. This play is not only dangerous from a strategic perspective, but it is likely to be physically harmful for the quarterback (ask Joe Montana).

For several years, this type of play went unchecked, until Bill Walsh began reinventing the position of left-tackle. In order to stop very fast, very strong linebackers from taking advantage of the left side, teams everywhere began looking for a very rare type of human: someone who is extremely large and powerful, with very long arms, but who can also move their hands and feet extremely quickly. This combination is so rare, that players who make good left tackles are typically the second-most highly paid member of the team, behind the quarterback. This is because a successful left-tackle is actually an insurance policy for a team’s quarterback, and quarterbacks who can complete passes win games.

So what does this have to do with SEO?

Once I was about 3/4 through the book I started to draw some parallels between the Left Tackle and the SEO. Think about it this way:

Originally, no one used the internet for marketing (passing game) very much as there were better ways to find customers. Along came this new breed of programmer, the web designer (passing quarterback), who depends heavily on the support of his team (the company’s resources and IT people) but who also builds spectacularly effective and cheap marketing campaigns (a successful passing game). The proliferation of this strategy introduces a new evolution: Google (Lawrence Taylor) which decreases the value of a website that doesn’t play by its rules (time available to throw the ball and complete a pass).

The next evolution is the creation of a new position, the SEO (left tackle). The range of skills needed (the specific size and weight) and the mental-quickness required to grasp, and invent, new tactics (the dexterity of hands and feet) means that successful recruits for this position are hard to find. The SEO (left tackle) is tasked not only with protecting the website investment (quarterback and passing game) from de-indexing (sacking), but also with promoting lead acquisition on the website (time available for the QB to complete a pass).

Often people in the industry wonder why a good SEO is paid as much as the web designer when all the marketing analysts and secondary programmers make less, in the same way that the NFL began to wonder why this one offensive lineman was making as much as the QB. In both cases, the SEO/Left Tackle has the unique ability not only to protect the value of a website by maintaining its good standing with Google (and the others) but also by increasing the site’s ability to obtain new customers.

Perhaps one of the most important parallels is drawn from Lewis asserting that when the Left Tackle has done his job, the play goes off smoothly and the quarterback is celebrated for his passing ability. Similarly, when a well-optimized website becomes a success, the crowd only sees a spectacular website, not the marketing behind it.

I won’t comment on designers and quarterbacks both being described as primadonnas and attention hogs, you can draw your own conclusions on that one.

Tags for This Post: football strategy, joe montana, ny giants, sociological perspective, blind side, michael oher

The Choice to Hire

August 20th, 2008

For a couple months now I’ve seen it coming: the need to hire someone to take over some of what I’m doing, so that I can do more. I think the one thing that shocks most people who’ve never run their own business is that you don’t get paid for all the time you work. What do I mean?

Think about working in a corporate environment (I started my business life as a Corporate SEO). If someone calls to talk about a contract, you send it to your sales team. If you need copies made, you can drop them off with the Admin Assistant. When you receive an invoice, you forward it over to Accounting. If your computer goes down, you call IT and go out for coffee. And, at many companies these days, your pay is direct-deposited so you don’t even have to go to the bank.

All of those services fly out the window when you go out on your own. You are your own IT, Admin, Accounting, HR and Management teams. All of that in addition to the fact that you need to get your work done every day. But you can’t exactly send a client an invoice with “5 hours – Fixed my computer” on it, can you? And that is why people who have only worked for companies are shocked to find out I may only do 20 hours of “work” per week. Except that those 20 hours of work took 40 hours of supporting effort. Even getting paid requires me to drive to the bank to deposit checks a couple times a week.

So, a few months ago when I stood with a total of 9 clients and could see my work-hours quickly outgrowing my ability to be more efficient, I began to work on the next challenge: what do I hire out? Assuming I could only afford one employee at the current volume, do I hire an Admin Assistant to take calls, make copies, and help organize meetings? Should I hire a sales person to manage my current contracts and help me find new ones? Should I attempt to find another SEO/PPC expert to take on client work (and if so, how can I be sure I can trust them to uphold the level of quality I demand for my clients?)? Or should I bring on an intern and hope that the amount of smaller-tasks I can hand off to them will outweigh the training time?

I am notoriously demanding when it comes to resumes. I often say that the minute I find the first typo I toss the resume, which is not far from the truth. I expect that one-page of writing shouldn’t be difficult to produce, and that you should have it so polished by the time you’re ready to send it out that I won’t find a thing wrong with it (from a technical perspective anyway). When I receive a five-page resume, or one written in the third person (another story for another time) I have to wonder what some people are thinking. So what’s the best way to get a job with Untouchable Marketing? Don’t send a resume.

As it turns out, the old adages about networking are correct, and knowing people is often greater than knowing anything else. I am going to try out an intern-esque position on a contract basis for the next 15 weeks or so to see if the outsourcing of tasks outweighs the training time. The candidate is actually family of a good friend/business partner who’s situation is well-suited to working from home. He’s qualified and never had to submit a resume.

How will I judge the outcome as a success? Like everything I else I look at numbers. I will feel the experiment is worthwhile if the dollars I pay are returned 2x in either hard dollars, or client approval (as measured by frequency of emails and number of referrals). If the experiment doesn’t meet this goal, then at least I was able to help out a friend and find out that I need to look for a partner or an assistant next.

Tags for This Post: couple times, admin assistant, sales person, corporate environment, management teams, deposit checks